Parallelism between quantum mechanics and gravity
Atoms are being maintained through the neutrons in their core, but at the same time can also annihilate through them, meaning, that neutrons are on the side responsible for the existence of an atom, but at the same time also responsible for it’s annihilation, and is therefore fulfilling a dual function.
Because, if the neutrons of an atom annihilated due to a circumstance, the positive charges of the remaining protons in the nucleus would cause the protons to repel one another through the Coulomb-Force acting in-between them, and would cause them to move away from the center of the nucleus.
Through the electromagnetic interaction between the protons of the nucleus and the surrounding electrons of the same atom, the surrounding electrons of the same atom are being drawn to the protons of the core.
In the process, the distance between the individual protons of the nucleus increases, while the distance between the electrons of the same atom decreases, causing the Coulomb-Force acting in between the individual protons to decreases exponentially, but the Coulomb-Force acting in between the individual electrons at the same time exponentially increases.
Because electrons have lesser mass than protons, they are less subject to inertia, and can therefore change their direction faster than the protons of the same atom, causing the velocity of the electrons to be higher than the velocity of the protons, which is why the electrons can overcome a far greater distance in the same time.
The slightest movement of the protons of the nucleus away from the center of the core, causes a huge movement from the side of the electrons towards the center of the nucleus.
The kinetic energy of both particles is a combination of their respective mass on the one side, and the their individual velocity on the other side.
Because protons have more mass than electrons, while not being able to change their direction as fast due to the inertia, they are subjected to, causing their velocity to be lesser than the velocity of the electrons, and because electrons have less mass the protons, while being able to change their direction faster, since they are less subject to inertia, causing their velocity to be greater than the velocity of the protons, causing the kinetic energy of both particles is more or less the same.
The kinetic energy of both particles is added in the same moment, in which the electron impinges on the proton, and will suffice, in order for the electron capture to occur, during which the electron is captured by the very proton, it impinges on, and during which the proton is turned into a neutron.
Protons und electrons find one another, while they are moving towards one another, since the complementarily opposite charges of the particles attract one another, causing the protons und electrons to be unable to miss one another, while they are moving in complementarily opposite directions.
After the annihilation of the original neutrons of the nucleus, the remaining protons are being turned into new neutrons during the electron capture, which can annihilate just like the original neutrons of the same atom.
While the protons of the nucleus are being turned into neutrons during the electron capture, electron-neutrinos are being created during the electron capture next to the new neutrons, too, in order for the overall number of leptons within the same atom to stay the same after the electron capture, meaning, that the task of the electron-neutrino is it, to replace the electrons of the same atom.
Electron-neutrinos are comparable with neutrons, because both have no charge and therefore no electromagnetic function, but at the same time do have mass, which is why it can be assumed, that the electron-neutrinos are going to be annihilated just like the neutrons of the same atom during the same event.
With the annihilation of the electron-neutrino, a complete annihilation of the entire atom and all of its subatomic particles will be achieved.
Because a complete annihilation of the entire atom with all of it’s quantum mechanics can be achieved, one can conclude, that a complete annihilation of the entire atom with all of it’s quantum mechanics indeed will take place.
And because a complete annihilation of the entire atom with all of it’s quantum mechanics can be achieved, one can conclude, that it is intended, which leads to the conclusion, that the quantum mechanics of an atom is not an arbitrary construct, but was created with creative intent.
Since the annihilation of the neutron is leading to a complete annihilation of the entire atom with all of it’s subatomic particles, and is therefore playing a key role during a potential, future of all matter, one can confirm the neutron as an integral annihilation mechanism of the atom with all of it’s quantum mechanics.
In order for the protons of an atom to annihilate, they have to be turned into neutrons during the electron capture, but in order for the electrons of the same atom to annihilate, they are not going to be turned into a different particle, but are going to be replaced by electron-neutrinos.
The difference between the change of a proton into a neutron and the replacement of the electron by an electron-neutrinos is, that after the change of the proton into a neutron, it remains the same particle, but after the replacement of the electron through an electron-neutrino, the electron as a particle indeed ceased to exist, and a completely new particle emerged in form of the electron-neutrino.
Since the existence of the atom, as well as it’s annihilation, both depend on the neutron, the function of the neutron is not just dual, but because of the contrast of both functions ambivalent at the same time.
The direct annihilation of the neutron and the indirect annihilation of the atom with its quantum mechanics is not just a theoretic possibility, but is indeed going to happen in a future event.
The maintaining function of the neutron manifests over the course of a timespan, and is therefore chronic, its annihilating function manifests in just one time point, and therefore acute.
The neutron is directly responsible for the annihilation of the atom and it’s quantum mechanics, the annihilation event responsible is directly responsible for the annihilation of the neutron, causing the event to be only indirectly responsible for the annihilation of the atom and it’s quantum mechanics.
In order to unterstand, what the annihilation event actually is, under which the annihilation of the neutron shall occur, one has to determine first, why the neutron annihilate because of this event, but not the other, subatomic particles of the atom.
The key difference between the neutron and the residual, subatomic particles is, that the neutron indeed does have mass, but no charge, and isn’t therefore fulfilling any electromagnetic function, but only a gravitative function due to it’s mass.
If exactly this sole function became irrelevant due to the annihilation event, so would this be paramount with the redundancy of the neutron as a whole, which would explain it’s annihilation.
The gravitative function of the remaining, subatomic particles of the atom will also be redundant, but because they have an electromagnetic function in addition to their gravitative function, the remaining, charged particles of the atom will still be maintained due to their partial Relevanz, and will therefore not annihilate with the neutrons of the nucleus.
Because of the electron capture the positive charge of the protons and the negative charges of the electrons are going to be neutralized, which causes the cessation of both of their electromagnetic function, and causes their sole, gravitative function to remain, which causes the annihilation of both particle due to the redundancy of their remaining, gravitative function.
Therefore it is to conclude, that the annihilation event, that will be responsible for the annihilation of the neutron and therefore responsible for the annihilation of the entire atom as a whole alongside with it’s quantum mechanics, must be the cessation of gravity.
Because the atom alongside with it’s quantum mechanics can only exist because of the neutron, and the neutron only exists because of gravity, the neutron can be considered as an interface between quantum mechanics and gravity, and therefore as an interface between quantum mechanics and classical physics.
The presence of an actual gravitational field is not necessary for the relevance of the neutron’s gravitational function, since the neutron can also exist independently of a gravitational field, it is far more the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity, that maintains the relevance of the neutron’s gravitational function.
The key difference between gravity and the potentiality for gravity is the actual appearance of a gravitational field within space, while potentiality for gravity solely describes the possibility of the occurrence of a gravitational field within space.
The potentiality of gravity allows for the actual appearance of a gravitational field within space due to the presence of mass, with the sudden cessation of it’s potentiality, the actual appearance of gravity would cease in the very same moment.
Therefore the potentiality for gravity is the necessary precondition for the actual appearance of gravity within the space.
The event, that is responsible for the cessation of the potentiality of gravity, has to also cause the cessation of the actual appearance of gravity due to the kausal relationship between both, so that it’s actual appearance in form of a gravitational field cannot appear any more.
The annihilation of the neutron and the cessation of the actual appearance of gravitational field is caused by the cessation of its potentiality due to the annihilation event, and does occur simultaneously.
In order to determine, what the annihilation event actually is, through which the cessation of the potentiality of gravity will be achieved, one must first determine, that gravity is in direct correlation to space itself, since without the presence of space, gravity couldn’t actually appear.
One can make two statements about space, namely, that it exists, and that it manifests a specific behavior, namely it’s expansion, which is why one can assume, that it’s expansive behavior is responsible for the potentiality for the occurrence gravity.
Therefore the expansive behavior of space does not just coincide with the contemporary potentiality for the appearance of gravity, but the expansive behavior of space is indeed a necessary precondition for the potentiality of the occurrence of gravity, so that there is a kausal relationship between both, which is why one can attribute the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity to the expansive behavior of space itself.
The difference between coincidence and attribution is, that in the case of coincidence one cannot attribute the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity to the expansive behavior of space itself, but both exist without a causal relationship next to one another, while in the case of attribution, the potentiality of gravity can only occur because of the expansive behavior of space.
Therefore the relationship between the expansive behavior of space and the potentiality for gravity is comparable with the relationship between cause and effect, while the expansive behavior of space is taking the role of the cause, and the resulting potentiality for gravity the role of the effect.
If the expansive behavior of space is indeed responsible for the potentiality for gravity, so can one conclude, that the complementarily opposite behavior of space must be responsible for the cessation of it’s potentiality, which would manifest in form of a contractive behavior of space.
Since the fringe of the space moves away from the center of the expansion, and the resulting distance in between both increases, one can consider the expansion as a manifestation of a positive, momentary change, the contraction though as a manifestation of a negative, momentary change, since the distance in between both decreases.
If one considered two points within this space, and measured the distance in between both, so would the distance in between both increase due to the positive, momentary change of the expansion, and if one considered the same two points under the manifestation of a negative, momentary change, so would the distance in between both decrease.
The manifestation of a positive, momentary change of the expansion of space can be described as ectomorphism, the manifestation of a negative, momentary change in form of a contraction can be described as endomorphism.
Space exists as a singularity, but is comprised out of two attributes, which are both of complementarily opposite nature, and are therefore conflicted.
The ectomorph behavior of space exists because of it’s partial disorderly attribute, which manifests in Form of expansive behavior, it’s endomorph behavior exists because of it’s partial orderly attribute, which manifests in form of contractive behavior.
Both attributes are always directly juxtaposed, and are intuitively configurated within space, which means, that the expansive, disorderly attribute is contained by its orderly, contractive attribute.
A counterintuitive juxtaposition would be given, if the disorderly attribute were excluded by the orderly attribute, and therefore the expansive attribute couldn’t be contained by the contractive attribute, causing the disorderly attribute to be not controlled by the orderly attribute.
During the ectomorph Expansion of space the inferior, disorderly attribute is predominant, during the endomorphen Kontraktion of space the superior, orderly attribute is predominant, both are always present in every single case.
If the negative, momentary change of an endomorph contraction of space causes the cessation of the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity, so can one conclude, that the lack of a momentary change in form of static behavior must be the so called minimum requirement for the potentiality for the occurrence gravity.
Therefore one ends up with a total of three, possible states, in which space can appear.
The static state with the absence of a momentary change combines the positive, momentary change of the expansion with the negative, momentary change of the contraction of space, whereby these two, complementarily opposite, momentary change are absolute, while the static state with the absence of a momentary change forms the partiality of both.
Therefore the manifestation of a positive, momentary change and the manifestation of a negative, momentary change of space are both extreme conditions of space, while a static state of space with the absence of a momentary change is the medium of the three, possible states of space.
While expansive and contractive behavior of space are both active states, since they both manifest a momentary change, the static state as the medium state is a passive state, since it doesn’t manifest any momentary change.
Expansive and kontrastive behavior of space are both asymmetric states, since both are directed in a specific direction, the static state is a symmetric state, since it isn’t directed in any direction.
The symmetry of the static state is evident due to the fact, that a deviation from it can happen through two possible states, be it through a contractive or through an expansive state, making both of these states equally likely, since each of both states can occur with a likelihood of 50%.
The asymmetry of both absolute states is evident due to the fact, that the current condition manifest with a likelihood of 100%, while the manifestation of the complementarily opposite state is impossible with a likelihood of 0%.
Space does act as a whole and therefore as one coherent entity, which means, that each point within the three-dimensional space has to manifest the exact same state.
Because space acts as a whole and does therefore act as one coherent entity homogeneously, which means, that one of the three, possible states has to appear throughout space, while the manifestation of another of the three, possible states in an isolated area within space is impossible.
If space as a whole manifested one of the three, possible states, and another of the three, possible states within an isolated area, so would this result in a heterogeneity, which would be impossible due to the homogeneity of space.
One can describe space from within with regard to it’s three dimensional space, and also from outside with regards to it’s two dimensional fringe, making space five-dimensional on total.
Three dimensional space creates the actual distance between the center of space and it’s fringe, if one drew a line in-between the center and the fringe, so would this line form a right angle, making the five Dimensions of space comparable with the form of a T-shape.
The expansive behavior of space, which one could determine due to increasing distance between two, arbitrary point within space, allows for the conclusion, that the overall Size of space increases, which one could measure considering the increasing distance between its center and the its fringe.
An increase in size can only happen, if space as a whole is limited in size, since infinity wouldn’t allow for an addition in size through expansive behavior.
If one added a number to infinity in form of an addition, so would the result of this addition be the same infinity, that already existed prior to the addition.
If one on the other side subtracted a number from infinity in form of a subtraction, so would the result of this subtraction be the same infinity, that already existed prior to the subtraction.
Addition and Subtraction through a fix number can only happen, if the underlying size is finite itself, but not infinite.
An expansive behavior of space as an addition of size and a contractive behavior of the same space as a minimization of size can only occur, if the underlying size of space is finite itself.
If space was infinite, the only possible state of the possible states would be the static state.
During the manifestation of a momentary change, it’s speed varies throughout space, since the further a point within space is located away from it’s center, the greater it’s speed, and the closer a point is to the center of space, the lesser it’s speed.
The center of space always stands still, while it’s fringe as the complementarily opposite extreme moves the fastest, since it is the furthest away from the center of space, and there is no point within space, that can be further away from it’s center.
Independently of the velocity of each point within space, the cessation of the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity during the endomorph collapse of space is everywhere given to the same extent.
The cessation of the potentiality for gravity does not increase accordingly with an increase in velocity further away from the center of space, but isn’t also diminished with a decrease in velocity closer to the center of space, but the result is everywhere the same independently of the punctual velocity of space.
If one came close to the center of the endomorph contraction, so that the distance to the center is infinitely minuscule, accordingly, the punctual velocity of the endomorph contraction would be infinitely miniscule, and would almost reach the a static state, and yet would be fully sufficient, to fully eliminate the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity.
If space as a whole manifested the static state, so would it be dangerously close to the infinitely minuscule, negative, momentary change, and is therefore theoretically the minimum requirement for the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity, practically tough it’s not enough to reliably guarantee it.
This is why only the positive, momentary change of an expansion of space is actually eligible as actual minimum requirement for the potentiality of gravity, it’s static state is the so-called Quasi-Minimum requirement, since it is theoretically the minimum requirement, but practically not enough to be eligible as such.
The extent of it’s positive, momentary change is irrelevant for the fulfillment of it’s actual minimum requirement für the potentiality of gravity, because if the positive, momentary change of the expansion came close to the static state in order for it to become infinitely miniscule, would it fully suffice, to fulfill the actual minimum requirement.
If the positive momentary change of the expansion increased, so would the actual minimum requirement for the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity not be more fulfilled, but would stay the same.
Because the variety of positive, momentary change throughout space is irrelevant for the fulfillment of the actual minimum requirement for the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity, only two possible states exist, either it’s fulfillment, or it’s nonfulfillment.
In the scenario of a potential cessation of the potentiality for gravity under the static state of the Quasi-Minimumrequirement, an infinitely minuscule, endomorph contraction of space would occur only for an akute time point.
Because the akute, infinitely minuscule, endomorph contraction is not intended unlike the static state of the Quasi-Minimumrequirement, and is therefore not deterministic, but happens reasonlessly and therefore spontaneously, it cannot be maintained, so that in the immediate aftermath of the infinitely minuscule, endomorph contraction of space, the original static state would be restored again.
In the time point of the akute, spontaneous, infinitely miniscule, endomorph contraction of space, the atom with all of its quantum mechanics would be irrevocably annihilated.
With the restoration of the original static state of space and the static state of the Quasi-Minimumrequirement the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity would be restored, the quantum mechanics of the atom tough couldn’t be restored after it’s total annihilation.
Although the atom alongside it’s quantum mechanics is directly maintained through the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity, it is actually, indirectly maintained through the positive, momentary change of it’s expansion, letting the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity function as a bridge between quantum mechanics and the positive, momentary change of its expansion.
The parallelism between the quantum mechanics of an atom and the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity is asymmetric, because the potentiality for gravity maintains quantum mechanics, but quantum mechanics does not maintain the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity to same extent.
If the quantum mechanics of the atom were annihilated, the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity would be unaffected, and wouldn’t be annihilated accordingly.
A symmetric relationship between the quantum mechanics of an atom and the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity would only exist, if quantum mechanics also maintained the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity to the same extent, and the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity could be potentially annihilated through the cessation of quantum mechanics.
The only element, it’s atom cannot annihilate with the cessation of the potentiality for gravity, is hydrogen, since it only has one proton as it’s core, which is why the necessary Coulomb-force cannot be created due to the lack of an additional proton, which normally acts in between to particles of the same charge, and that is necessary in order for the proton to move away from the center of the atom, and to at the same time attract the electron in order for the electron capture to occur, and to achieve a neutralization of both charges.
Because the annihilation mechanism integrated in each atom in form of the neutron leads to a complete annihilation of the entire atom, one can assume, that there must be an annihilation mechanism set in place for the hydrogen atom as an alternative to the neutron.
In order for the electron to be captured by the proton of the hydrogen atom, it must be thrown out of its orbit, which can only happen, if the future, endomorph collapse of space happens abruptly.
Because there is a necessity for an abrupt, endomorph contraction of space, in order to achieve the annihilation of hydrogen next to the annihilation of every other element, one can assume, that the future, endomorph contraction of space will indeed happen abruptly.
The direction, in which the electron is thrown out of its orbital, is provided by the endomorph contraction of space itself, which will occur in the same direction as the endomorph contraction of space itself.
As soon as the electron leaves it’s orbital, the electromagnetic interaction between it and the proton causes it to be attracted by the proton, and at the same time the proton is being attracted by the electron.
Because the proton has a greater mass than the electron, it is more subjected to intertia, and can therefore change it’s direction not as fast, and does therefore travel a shorter distance in the same time period compared to the electron.
Because the electron has lesser mass than the proton, it is less subjected to intertia, and can therefore change its direction faster, and does therefore travel a greater distance than the proton in the same time period.
Which means, that the proton travels slowlier than the electron, and the electron travels faster than the proton.
Since the proton overall travels slowlier than the electron, but has more mass, and the electron travels faster than the proton, but has less mass, the kinetic energies of both particles are more or less the same in the very moment, in which they meet one another during the electron capture.
During the electron capture the proton is being turned into a neutron, which will then annihilate due to the cessation of the potentiality for the occurrence of gravity, just like the newly created electron-neutrino, which will be created during the electron capture, so that a complete annihilation of hydrogen will be achieved.
Because the contemporary, ectomorph expansion of space ensues gradually, unlike the abrupt, future, endomorph contraction, the electron on its orbital is not going to be thrown out, but remains on its orbit.
Because the number of electrons and protons in an atom normally is equal, a complete annihilation of the entire atom with all of its quantum mechanics can be achieved.
In the case of an ion though, there is an imbalance in the number of protons and electrons in an atom, since an anion has more surrounding electrons than protons in the nucleus, and a cation has more protons in it’s core than surrounding electrons.
In the case of the annihilation of an anion there would be a surplus of electrons, and in the case of the annihilation of a cation there would be a surplus of protons.
During the future, endomorph contraction of space, space is going to decrease in it’s size, causing all remaining, charged particles to be concentrated towards the center of space, while the complementarily opposite charges of the remaining, charged particles cause mutual attraction and form the necessary pairs of protons and electrons, which are required for the electron capture, which will lead to the complete annihilation of all residual particles.
A complete annihilation of all subatomic particles can only be achieved, if the overall number of protons and electrons in space is identical, because a pair of electrons and protons is required for the electron capture.
In order for the electron capture to occur, the velocity of the endomorph contraction of space must be great enough, so that the velocity of protons and electrons, and therefore their kinetic energy is high enough for the electron capture to occur, to achieve the neutralization of charge, which is necessary for their annihilation.
During an endomorph collapse of space a proton and an electron will be located at different spots within space, while both are going to move towards the center of space, the particle through, that is closer to the center of space will move slowlier, the particle, that is further away from the center of space, is going to move faster.
The discrepancy in velocity between both particles has to be sufficient, in order for the kinetic energy of both particles to be great enough for the obligatory electron capture.
The closer one gets to the center of the endomorph contraction, the lesser the discrepancy between both particles will be, and yet will be fully enough for the electron capture to occur, which leads to the conclusion, that the endomorph collapse of space will ensure extremely fast.
The overall number of protons and electrons indeed is identical, because the first element was hydrogen, which consists out of a proton and an electron, which is the exact pair, that is required for the electron capture.
Because the first element was indeed hydrogen, there must be an electron for each proton, and one proton for each electron, which allows for a complete annihilation of all matter.
The change from the manifestation of a positive, momentary change of space to the manifestation of a negative momentary change is immediate, since the contractive behavior of space comes immediately after it’s expansive period, which is why the change occurs within one acute time point.
Within this one time point space stands still and therefore manifests the medium of its three, possible states.
The expansion of space is paramount with existence itself, because it is maintaining quantum mechanics, the contraction of space on the other hand as the complementarily opposite process is paramount with annihilation itself.
The existence of quantum mechanics is consistent with the expansion of space, because increasingly more space is being created for it, the annihilation of quantum mechanics is consistent with it’s contraction, since increasingly less space remains due to the contraction of space.
Without the annihilation of quantum mechanics the endomorph contraction of space couldn’t be finished, with the fringe of space aligning with its center.
The expansion of space happens first, and then the endomorph contraction directly in addition, which is why expansion as well as contraction both can be considered as two subsequent phases.
Time occurs in two forms, namely on the one hand in form of a time span, and on the other hand in form of time points, which both are complementarily opposite to one another, since the time point is an acute form of time in contrast to the time span, which is a chronic form of time.
The acuity of a time point is suitable for accentuation of a chronic time span, which is why time points on the one hand substantiate time spans, and at the same time also conclude them.
Since the ektomorph expansion of space occurs gradually over the course of a time span, it is consistent with the chronic of a timespan, and because the endomorph contraction of space occurs abruptly within one time point, it is consistent with the acuity of a time point.