The five-dimensional duality can be described as a hierarchical structure, which is made up of three consecutive parts, from which each serve as building block.

The three consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality do not just follow one another, but are also build on one another, because the middle part rests on the lowest part and the highest part rests on the middle part, which means that there is causality in the consecutive structure of the three consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality.

The five-dimensional duality with its three consecutive parts is made up of a total of two individual dualities, namely a lesser and a greater duality.

The lesser duality is smaller in relative comparison to the greater duality, and the greater duality is larger in relative comparison to the lesser duality, which means that the size ratio of both dualities is relative to each other and the size of one duality can only be interpreted through the size of the other duality.

A duality consists of two parts that exist next to each other, as does the lesser duality, which consists of the first and second parts of the lesser duality and are located directly next to each other as the two building blocks of the lesser duality.

Like the lesser duality, the greater duality also consists of two individual parts, namely the first and the second part of the greater duality, which are also located directly next to each other as the two building blocks of the greater duality.

The two parts of each duality correspond to the size of the respective duality, the two parts of the lesser duality are correspondingly just as small as the lesser duality itself, and the two parts of the greater duality are correspondingly just as large as the greater duality itself.

The lesser duality is within the first part of the greater duality, thus the lesser duality is nested with the greater duality, whereby the lesser duality is not the first part of the greater duality itself, but is merely nested within it.

Because the lesser duality is enclosed within the first part of the greater duality, the lesser duality cannot be divorced from the greater duality, and the greater duality on the other hand cannot be divorced from the lesser duality, so together they can only be described as a double duality.

Because both dualities are nested with each other, one must consider the greater duality as soon as one considers the lesser duality, and as soon as one considers the greater duality, one must also consider the lesser duality, so that both dualities can only be considered together and not separately from each other.

Because the two dualities are inseparable, the five-dimensional duality can only be described as a double duality, which is made up of three consecutive parts, but a total of four individual parts, which are the two parts of the two respective dualities.

Of the total of four parts of the double duality, only three parts are located next to each other in a consecutive sequence, because the smaller duality is located within the first part of the larger duality, and therefore the first part of the larger duality is included in the complete count, but not in the consecutive count.

The three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality can possess attributes as properties, whereby an attribute is present in all three, consecutive parts, but decreases in intensity from the first part of the lesser duality as the lower part via the second part of the lesser duality as the middle part to the second part of the greater duality as the upper part.

Because an attribute tapers off from the first part of the lesser duality to the second part of the greater duality, it does exist in the first part of the lesser duality, but doesn’t anymore in the second part of the greater duality.

In the second part of the lesser duality, the attribute exists in a weaker form compared to the first part of the lesser duality below, but in a stronger form compared to the second part of the greater duality above, thus combining the strong form of the attribute of the inferior, first part of the lesser duality with the weak form of the same attribute of the superior, second part of the greater duality.

The first part of the lesser duality as the lower part is one extreme and thus the lower absolute, the second part of the greater duality as the upper part is the upper extreme and thus the upper absolute, the second part of the lesser duality as the middle part forms a partiality of both absolutes.

Because the first part of the lesser duality is on this side of the second part of the lesser duality, it is called the lower absolute, and because the second part of the greater duality is on the other side of the second part of the lesser duality, it is called the upper absolute.

The tapering of the attribute from the first part of the lesser duality through the second part of the lesser duality to the second part of the greater duality is an asymmetrical behavior, because it is oriented unilaterally in a certain direction, it follows a specific syntax.

The first part of the lesser duality as the lower absolute and the second part of the greater duality as the upper absolute form the partiality of both absolutes in the second part of the lesser duality, which is a symmetrical behavior, and because it is not oriented in a certain direction, it does not follow a unilaterally directed syntax.

While one Attribute does taper of from the first part of the lesser duality as the lower absolute via the second part of the lesser duality to the second part of the greater duality as the upper absolute and stays the same all along, the nature of both extreme parts is complementarily opposite, und form a partiality in the second part of the lesser duality out of both absolutes.

One aspect, that describes the nature of the first part of the lesser duality, is it’s limitation, the complementarily opposite aspect of the second part of the greater duality is it’s infinity, both form partiality in the second part of the lesser duality between them, which is limited just like the first part of the lesser duality, but is far larger than the first part of the lesser duality.

The complementary opposition of the both extreme parts of the five-dimensional duality, which form partiality in the second part of the lesser duality between them, is a symmetric behavior of the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality.

The symmetrical behavior and the asymmetrical behavior manifest themselves in the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality simultaneously through their attributes.

Because the second part of the lesser duality as the middle part unites the absolute of the first part of the lesser duality and the absolute of the second part of the greater duality through partiality, it serves as a bridge between the two extreme parts.

The second part of the lesser duality can thus be understood as an overlap of the first part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality as the two extreme parts.

The first part of the lesser duality as the absolute on this side and the second part of the greater duality as the absolute on the other side are incompatible with each other due to their opposing absoluteness, which is why the partiality of the second part of the lesser duality in between is needed, which functions as a mediator.

The step from the absolute of the first part of the lesser duality to the absolute of the second part of the greater duality is just as absolute, the step from the absolute of the first part of the lesser duality to the adjacent, second part of the lesser duality in its partiality is just as partial, just as the step from the second part of the lesser duality to the second part of the greater duality.

Thus, the first part of the lesser duality as the absolute on this side is both partially compatible and partially incompatible with the superior, second part of the lesser duality in its partiality, which also applies to the second part of the lesser duality itself with respect to the superior, second part of the greater duality as the absolute on the other side.

The second part of the lesser duality as a bridge is bilaterally oriented, so that on the one hand it is oriented from the first part of the lesser duality towards the second part of the greater duality, and at the same time from the second part of the greater duality towards the first part of the lesser duality.

The second part of the lesser duality as the middle part of the three consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality does not only connect the first part of the lesser duality as the lower part with the second part of the greater duality as the upper part, but also separates them from each other by maintaining a distance between them through bilateral resistance.

The lower gap of the five-dimensional duality between the first part of the lesser duality and the second part of the lesser duality can be variable in width, while the upper gap between the second part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality is fixed in width.

The upper gap must be fixed in width so that the second part of the lesser duality can be suspended by adhesion to the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

The lower gap does not have to be fixed, but can be variable in width, because the interaction between the second part of the lesser duality and the first part of the lesser duality is not based on adhesion, but on the fact that the second part of the lesser duality rests on the first part of the lesser duality.

That the lower gap is variable in width, and the upper gap is fixed, is consistent with the tapering of an attribute from the first part of the lesser duality, through the second part of the lesser duality, to the second part of the greater duality, because the tapering is comparable with a pyramid consisting out of three, individual parts, and wich is tapering from its lower part over its middle part to its upper part.

Although the second part of the lesser duality is suspended from the fixed curvature of the second part of the greater duality, it can also fall from it, so that the fallen, second part of the lesser duality rests entirely on the first part of the lesser duality, and not just partially.

The fall of the second part of the lesser duality from the fixed curvature of the second part of the greater duality is irreversible, so that the second part of the lesser duality cannot straighten itself after its fall, but must be straightened again by the second part of the greater duality.

Because the gap between the second part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality is fixed, both parts can be considered together, sharing a common perspective, and facing the first part of the lesser duality, which has a single perspective and is separated from the two superior parts by the variable-width gap, resulting in only two separate perspectives from the original three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality.

Double duality is called five-dimensional duality because it is viewed through a total of five dimensions, the first part of the lesser duality is viewed through the first dimension, and the second part of the lesser duality is viewed through the second dimension.

The first part of the greater duality, and thus the entire lesser duality within it, is viewed through the third dimension, and the second part of the greater duality is viewed through the fourth dimension.

The fifth dimension is the final dimension and, in contrast to all other dimensions, cannot be assigned to it’s own part, but encompasses both parts of the greater duality as a whole, and thus the entire double duality.

Through the first dimension, the first part of the lesser duality is first considered alone and the second part of the lesser duality is also considered alone through the second dimension, so that they can then be considered together through the third dimension.

In the same way, the first part of the greater duality is first considered alone through the third dimension, just as the second part of the greater duality is first considered alone through the fourth dimension, so that they can then be considered together through the fifth dimension.

Just as the lesser duality is lesser than the greater duality, so is the third dimension lesser than the fifth dimension in relative comparison, and just as the greater duality is greater than the lesser duality, so is the fifth dimension greater than the third dimension in relative comparison.

The first part of the lesser duality stands through its lower end by itself as the lower absolute, the second part of the greater duality carries itself through its upper end by itself as the upper absolute.

The second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, since it partially stands on the inferior, first part of the lesser duality, and at the same time is supported at its upper end by the superior, second part of the greater duality.

The first part of the lesser duality is absolutely unyielding as the absolute on this side, the second part of the greater duality is absolutely yielding as the absolute on the other side, the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, so that it is partially yielding with regards to the inferior, first part of the lesser duality and partially unyielding with regards to the superior, second part of the greater duality.

The second part of the lesser duality is more yielding than the inferior, first part of the lesser duality, which is why the second part of the lesser duality can weigh on the inferior, first part of the lesser duality.

But because the second part of the greater duality is absolutely yielding, and thus more yielding than the inferior, second part of the lesser duality, the second part of the lesser duality cannot be directly suspended by the sufficiently firm curvature below its lower end as an additional element of the five-dimensional duality, through which the inferior, second part of the lesser duality can now be suspended.

The sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality is added in addition to the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality, and is thus an additional element, which is situated between the second part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality.

Although the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality as an additional element is situated between the superior, second part of the greater duality itself and the inferior, second part of the lesser duality, it only belongs to the second part of the greater duality, but not to the second part of the lesser duality.

The second part of the greater duality can sustain itself because it is infinite, and reaches out towards it’s own infinity, and is thus drawn through it’s own infinity, which it can not achieve, for the second part of the greater duality tries in vain to find its own end, because of its own infinity, and because it is drawn through its own infinity.

The infinity of the second part of the greater duality is the upper absolute, the first part of the lesser duality is limited as the lower absolute, the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, and is thus greater than the absolutely limited, first part of the lesser duality beneath, but smaller than the infinite, second part of the greater duality above.

The first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself and thus causes intrinsic resistance from its lower end to its upper end, the second part of the greater duality sustains itself through the extrinsic draw of it’s own infinity, whereby both extreme parts of the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality behave in complementarily opposite manner to one another.

The second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, because on the one hand it stands on the first part of the lesser duality through its lower end and thus partially intrinsically resisting, but at the same time the second part of the lesser duality is pulled at its upper end by the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality through partially extrinsic draw.

Because the first part of the lesser duality stands absolutely by itself, it is absolutely independent, but because the second part of the lesser duality is partially suspended trough it’s upper end by the fixed curvature of the second part of the greater duality, and is only partially dependent on inferior, first part of the lesser duality, it is on the one side partially dependent on the second part of the greater duality above, and at the same time partially independent through the first part of the lesser duality beneath.

Because the second part of the greater duality is completely self-supporting due to the draw of it’s own infinity and because there is no other part above him due to it’s own infinity, wich it could dependent on, it itself as the upper absolute is as independent as the first part of the lesser duality.

The second part of the greater duality is absolutely transcendent, because it is the upper extreme part of the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality, and there is no other part above it.

The first part of the lesser duality is absolutely immanent, because it is the lower extreme part of the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality and there is no other part below it.

The second part of the lesser duality as the middle part unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, so that on the one hand it is partially transcendent to the inferior, first part of the lesser duality, but at the same time it is also partially immanent to the superior, second part of the greater duality.

Because the second part of the lesser duality transcends the first part of the lesser duality, the second part of the lesser duality includes it under itself, but the first part of the lesser duality is immanent to the second part of the lesser duality, and thus excludes the second part of the lesser duality upwards.

Because the second part of the greater duality transcends the first part of the greater duality, the second part of the greater duality includes the first part of the greater duality below itself, but the first part of the greater duality excludes the second part of the greater duality above it.

Because the first part of the lesser duality and the second part of the lesser duality are juxtaposed, the second part of the lesser duality begins, where the first part of the lesser duality ends, and because also the second part of the greater duality and the first part of the greater duality are juxtaposed, the second part of the greater duality begins, where the inferior, first part of the greater duality ends.

There can only be one part on each level within the five-dimensional duality, and the position of the corresponding part must be justified.

The second part of the lesser duality as the middle part of the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality is complete, which is why the inferior, first part of the lesser duality has to be incomplete, in order for it’s inferior position to be justified.

The incompleteness of the first part of the lesser duality is infinitesimal, because although the condition of incompleteness must be fulfilled on the one hand to justify it’s inferior position, but because the completeness of the second part of the lesser duality is desirable on the other hand, the infinitesimal incompleteness in the upper end of the first part of the lesser duality is a compromise out of both.

The second part of the greater duality must be more than the complete, inferior, second part of the lesser duality in order to be justified in its superior position, whereby it behaves in a complementarily opposite manner to the first part of the lesser duality as the lower part due to it’s infinite boundlessness.

The directions of the infinitesimal incompleteness of the first part of the lesser duality and the infinit boundlessness of the second part of the greater duality behave in the complementarily opposite manner, since the infinitesimal incompleteness of the first part of the lesser duality is directed from it’s upper end to it’s lower end, but the infinite boundlessness of the second part of the greater duality is directed from it’s lower end to it’s upper end.

The slight incompleteness of the first part of the lesser duality reduces it correspondingly infinitesimally, the complementarily opposite, infinite boundlessness of the first part of the lesser duality reduces it correspondingly infinitesimally.

Because the second part of the lesser duality is itself complete, it itself embodies completeness, and since the second part of the lesser duality is suspended by the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, it falls from it, if it becomes incomplete against it’s own complete nature.

The infinitesimal incompleteness of the first part of the lesser duality is the lower absolute, the infinite boundlessness of the second part of the greater duality is the upper absolute, the perfection of the second part of the lesser duality in between forms partiality out of both absolutes.

The lung as the second part of the lesser duality stands in its relationship to the heart as the first part of the lesser duality located below it within the pericardial cavity, that is formed by the lower part of the lung, and at the same time to the air of the surroundings on the outside of the thoracic cavity as the second part of the greater duality.

The heart is resisting intrinsically from its center, just as the first part of the lesser duality, that stands completely by itself and is therefore causing intrinsic resistance, the seemingly infinite air of the environment as the second part of the greater duality carries itself, just as the second part of the greater duality, that carries itself through the extrinsic pull of it’s own infinity.

The heart as the first part of the lesser duality is absolutely unyielding as the lower absolute, the air as the second part of the greater duality is absolutely yielding as the upper absolute, the lungs as the second part of the lesser duality in-between unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, so that on the one hand it is more yielding than the heart below, so that it can bear weight on it through its lower end, but on the other hand it is more unyielding than the superior air of the environment as the second part of the greater duality, so that it cannot be directly suspended by it.

The thoracic wall serves as a sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, and stands between the lungs as the second part of the lesser duality, and the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality, and can therefore serve as a suspension for the lung.

The lung as the second part of the lesser duality is directly attached to the thoracic wall as the sufficiently solid curvature of the second part of the greater duality, and thus indirectly to the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality.

The heart as the first part of the lesser duality and the lungs as the second part of the lesser duality are juxtaposed as the two parts of the lesser duality and form the entire lesser duality.

The lesser duality lies within the first part of the greater duality, so do the heart and the lung lie within the entire thoracic cavity as the first part of the greater duality, which is juxtaposed to the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality.

The air outside the thoracic cavity is seemingly infinite, which corresponds to the actual infinity of the second part of the greater duality as the upper absolute, and is opposed to the heart as the first part of the lesser duality in its finiteness as the lower absolute.

The lung as the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, and is thus larger than the heart below, but smaller than the air of the environment in its apparent infinity above.

The heart as the first part of the lesser duality is immanent to the lungs as the second part of the lesser duality due to it’s inferior Position, just as the entire thorax as the first part of the greater duality in relation to the air of the environment as the second part of the greater duality.

The lungs as the second part of the lesser duality are transcendent to the heart as the first part of the lesser duality, the air of the environment as the second part of the greater duality is transcendent to the entire thoracic cavity as the first part of the greater duality.

The heart as the first part of the lesser duality and lower absolute is absolutely immanent, the air of the surroundings as the second part of the greater duality and the upper absolute is absolutely transcendent, the lungs as the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, and is partially immanent in relation to the superior air of the surroundings and partially transcendent in relation to the inferior heart.

The first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself as the lower absolute and is causing intrinsic resistance from it’s lower end to it’s upper end, just as the heart as the first part of the lesser duality, that lies within the pericardial cavity of the lung, and is causing intrinsic resistance from it’s center to it’s fringe.

The second part of the greater duality carries itself as the upper absolute due to the extrinsic draw of it’s own infinity at it’s upper end, just as the the seemingly infinite air of the surroundings as the second part of the greater duality, that completely carries itself.

The second part of the lesser duality between them unites in itself both absolutes through partiality, so that on the one hand it stands partially by itself like the first part of the lesser duality, and at the same time is partially carried through it’s upper end like the second part of the greater duality, just as the lung as the second part of the lesser duality rest partially on the heart below through it’s lower end, and at the same time is partially supported through it’s upper end by the thoracic wall as the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

The first part of the lesser duality is absolutely unyielding as the lower absolute, so that the partially yielding, second part of the lesser duality can rest on it, just as the tissue of the lung as the second part of the lesser duality is more yielding than the tissue of the heart as the first part of the lesser duality, so that it can rest on it.

Thus the lung as the second part of the lesser duality unites the absolute unyieldingness of the heart as the first part of the lesser duality, and the absolute yieldingness of the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality in it through partiality.

Because the second part of the greater duality is absolute yielding, the inferior, second part of the lesser duality, which is more unyielding than the second part of the greater duality, cannot be suspended by it, which is why it requires the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

The surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality is more yielding than the lung as the second part of the lesser duality, which is why it requires the thoracic wall as the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, through which the lung can be suspended.

Thus, the lung as the second part of the lesser duality is not carried directly by the air of the environment as the second part of the greater duality, but only indirectly by the thoracic wall as the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality in-between as the additional element of the five-dimensional duality.

Just as the solid curvature of the second part of the greater duality is between the second part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality, but only belongs to the second part of the greater duality, so is the thoracic wall between the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality and the lung as the second part of the lesser duality, but only belongs to the surrounding air.

Just as the upper end of the second part of the lesser duality is curved outwardly, so that it can engage with the inner curvature of the solid curvature of the second part of the greater duality above, so is the lung curved outwardly, in order for it to engage with the inner curvature of the thoracic wall.

The gap between the second part of the lesser duality and the first part of the lesser duality is variable in width, just as the gap between the heart as the first part of the lesser duality and the lung as the second part of the lesser duality is variable in width.

The gap between the second part of the lesser duality and the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality is fix, just as the gap between the lung as the second part of the lesser duality and the thoracic wall as the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

The lung as the second part of the lesser duality does not adhere directly to the thoracic wall as the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, but only indirectly through a self-contained double skin, which encloses a liquid within itself, and thus causes an adhesive force between the two adjacent inner sides of the double skin.

The outer side of the double skin facing the lung is fused to the outer side of the lung, the outer side of the double skin facing the thoracic wall is fused to the inner side of the thoracic wall, which means that there is only indirect interaction between the lung and the thoracic wall through the double skin.

If air were to enter the gap between the double skin through an injury, the adhesive force between the two inner sides of the double skin would be canceled, and thus the gap within the double skin would increase in width, so that the lung as the second part of the lesser duality would fall from the thoracic wall as the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

After the fall of the lung it would completely weigh on the heart below, just as the second part of the lesser duality, that would completely weigh on the first part of the lesser duality below after it’s fall from the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

Just as the fall of the second part of the lesser duality from the sufficiently solid curvature of the second part of the greater duality is irreversible, so too is the fall of the lung as the second part of the lesser duality from the thoracic wall shielding it as the sufficiently solid curvature of the second part of the greater duality irreversible.

Just as the second part of the lesser duality cannot straighten itself up again on its own after falling from the sufficiently solid curvature of the second part of the greater duality, but must be straightened up externally, so the lung as the second part of the lesser duality cannot straighten itself up again on its own after falling from the thoracic wall, but must be straightened up externally.

The air, that has entered into the gap of the double skin must be sucked out, the injury must be closed, and the two inner sides of the double skin have to lie on top one another with the fluid in-between, in order to restore the adhesion between the two inner sides of the double skin.

The entire body can also be interpreted as the first part of the lesser duality and the lower absolute, which faces the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality as the upper absolute, both of which are incompatible with each other in direct contact as their respective complementarily opposite absolute, which is why it needs the lung as the second part of the lesser duality in-between, which creates a bridge between both absolutes through partiality.

The lung in-between as the second part of the lesser duality therefore serves as a mediator between both absolutes, and does allow for an interaction between the surrounding air on the one side and the bodily tissue on the other side, since through the lung the gas exchange takes place, through which carbondioxide from the body tissue is exhaled, and oxygen from the surrounding air is inhaled and absorbed by the body tissue.

The lung is to be understood as an overlap between the actual body tissue as the first part of the lesser duality, and the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality, since the surrounding air extends into the actual body.

The surrounding air extents into the interior of the lung and is enclosed in the alveoli, and is itself curved outwardly, while the alveoli themselves are curved inwardly in complementarily opposite manner, which is why the outwardly curved, enclosed air of the surroundings is nestled within the inward curve of the alveolus.

The lung as the second part of the lesser duality is the interface between the body tissue as the first part of the lesser duality and the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality, allows the supply of oxygen from the air into the body tissue, and at the same time the removal of carbon dioxide from the body tissue into the air, whereby its orientation is bilateral according to the bilateral orientation of the second part of the lesser duality.

The body tissue as the first part of the lesser duality in its consistency is the lower absolute an is opposed to the air of the environment as the second part of the greater duality in its nothingness as the upper absolute, the lung forms partiality from both absolutes through inconsistency, because on the one hand the lung is tissue like the body tissue, but at the same time air like the air of the environment.

The air enclosed in the alveoli is a subject because it is immanent in relation to the enclosing lung, whereas the lung is an object, because it is transcendent in relation to the air enclosed in it.

Blood components correspond to the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality with the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality as additional element.

The white blood cell is the first part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the first dimension, the red blood cell is the second part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the second dimension, both together forming the lesser duality within the first part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the third dimension.

The blood plasma as the actual medium of the blood is the second part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the fourth dimension, and is viewed together with the first part of the greater duality through the fifth dimension.

The white blood cell as the first part of the lesser duality is opposed to the red blood cell as the second part of the lesser duality.

The blood plasma is a medium that corresponds to the voidness of the second part of the greater duality and is opposed to both blood corpuscles as the two parts of the lesser duality and thus the first part of the greater duality.

The red blood corpuscle as the second part of the lesser duality is transcendent to the white blood corpuscle as the first part of the lesser duality, just as the blood plasma as the second part of the greater duality, which is transcendent to the lesser duality.

The white blood cell as the first part of the lesser duality is immanent to the red blood cell as the second part of the lesser duality, just as the first part of the greater duality is immanent to the blood plasma as the second part of the greater duality.

The white blood corpuscle as the first part of the lesser duality is the lowest part of the three consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality as the lower absolute in its absolute immanence, the blood plasma as the second part of the greater duality as the upper part is the upper absolute in its absolute transcendence.

The red blood cell as the second part of the lesser duality and the middle part of the five-dimensional duality forms out of both absolutes partiality, and is on the one hand partially transcendent to the inferior, first part of the lesser duality, and at the same time partially immanent to the superior, second part of the greater duality.

The platelet is responsible for blood coagulation and corresponds to the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, which stands in between the second part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality.

The platelet as the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality belongs only to the blood plasma as the second part of the greater duality, but not to the red blood cell as the second part of the lesser duality, although it is positioned between them.

The red blood cell as the second part of the lesser duality alternately carries both oxygen in the arteries and carbon dioxide in the veins, and therefore breathes like the lung, which is also alternately filled with oxygen-rich breath during an inhale and dioxide-rich breath during an exhale.

The red blood cell as the second part of the lesser duality and the lung as the second part of the lesser duality are not just comparable in their function, but also inhabit the same position within the five-dimensional duality.

Just as the surface of the lungs is enlarged by the alveoli for the gas exchange, the surface of the red blood cell is enlarged as well by the convex edge and the concave center, which allows for the binding of more oxygen and carbon dioxide.

The overlap of the first part of the lesser duality as the lower absolute with the second part of the greater duality as the upper absolute happens in the second part of the lesser duality between them in it’s partiality.

The direction of the overlap is bilateral, since the first part of the lesser duality extents into the second part of the greater duality, and at the same time the second part of the greater duality extents into the first part of the lesser duality.

So does the intestine form an overlap with it’s content within, since the intestine as the first part of the lesser duality extents through it’s villi into it’s content as the second part of the greater duality, in the very same manner, in which the content of the intestine does extend into the gabs in-between the villi and therefore the intestine itself.

The villi between both extreme parts are the second part of the lesser duality, in which the actual overlap of both extremes takes place.

The actual intestine is the first part of the lesser duality and is viewed through the first dimension, the villi are bulges of the intestine extending from it into it’s interior and are the second part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the second dimension, both together form the entire lesser duality and therefore the first part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the third dimension.

The content of the intestine is the second part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the fourth dimension, both parts of the greater duality are viewed together through the fifth dimension.

The second part of the greater duality normally transcends the first part of the greater duality within the five-dimensional duality, nonetheless the content as the second part of the greater duality is situated within the gut as the first part of the lesser duality, making the first part of the greater duality transcendent to the second part of the greater duality, and the second part of the greater duality immanent to the first part of the greater duality.

The first part of the lesser duality is immanent to the second part of the lesser duality in the five-dimensional duality, but the actual intestine as the first part of the lesser duality is transcendent to the villi as the second part of the lesser duality beneath, and the villi as the second part of the lesser duality are immanent to the actual intestine above.

The actual intestine as the first part of the lesser duality is the upper absolute of the five-dimensional duality and is absolutely transcendent, the content as the second part of the greater duality is the lower absolute and is absolutely immanent, the villi as the second part of the lesser duality unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, and are partially immanent with regards to the actual intestine above, and at the same time partially transcendent with regards to the content of the intestine.

The villi extending into the small intestine as the second part of the lesser duality form an inconsistency through partiality from the consistency of the actual intestine as the first part of the lesser duality and it’s contents as the second part of the greater duality, for the contents are situated in the interstices of the villi.

Comparable to the lung as the second part of the lesser duality, which increases its surface area through the alveoli for the gas exchange, the villi increase their surface area through their convex protrusion at their upper end and through their concave attachment to the actual intestine at their lower end, in order to absorb nutrients from the content.

Thus the contents, that are situated in-between the villi, are a subject, because they are immanent in relation to the actual villi, but the villi are an object, because they are transcendent in relation to the contents in-between them.

Via the villi nutrients from the content are absorbed through their mucous membranes and reach the larger blood vessels of the actual intestine through capillaries, and are thus forming a bridge as the second part of the lesser duality between the actual intestine as the first part of the lesser duality and the contents as the second part of the greater duality.

However, because nutrients are only transported from the contents to the actual intestine as the first part of the lesser duality, the orientation of the bridge is not bilateral as is usual for the second part of the lesser duality, but only unilateral.

The intestinal villi are an overlap between the actual intestine as the first part of the lesser duality, and the contents as the second part of the greater duality, in the very same manner, in which the intestine extents into the content, so does the content extent into the intestine.

The outwardly curved end of the villus extents into the contents, which is why the contents must be complementarily oppositely inwardly curved, at the same time the outwardly curved contents extent into the interstices of the villi, which is why the lower end of the interstices must be complementarily oppositely inwardly curved.

The first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself through intrinsic resistance from it’s lower end to it’s upper end, just as the tissue of the actual intestine, that causes intrinsic resistance from it’s center towards it’s surface.

The second part of the greater duality as upper absolute carries itself through the draw of it’s own infinity, the villi as the second part of the lesser duality unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, and are therefore partially intrinsically resisting from the inner wall of the intestine as their lower end and at the same time are partially drawn at their upper end, because they reach out for interaction with the contents.

The partial behavior of the villi corresponds to the second part of the lesser duality, which is partially causing resistance from it’s lower end to it’s upper end, but at the same time is pulled from its upper end by the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality above.

The LORD as the originator of the five-dimensional duality consists of a total of three entities himself, which correspond to the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality.

On the one hand, there is the LORD as the second part of the greater duality, and the LORD as the second part of the lesser duality beneath him within the hierarchy of the five-dimensional duality.

The angel of the LORD is the first part of the lesser duality and is viewed through the first dimension, the LORD is the second part of the lesser duality and is viewed through the second dimension, both together form the entire lesser duality within the first part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the third dimension.

The LORD as the second part of the greater duality is viewed through the fourth dimension, and the entire hierarchy with all three entities is viewed through the fifth dimension.

The LORD is transcendent to the Angel of the LORD, just as the LORD is transcendent to the LORD, the Angel of the LORD is immanent to the LORD, just as the LORD is immanent to the LORD.

The Angel of the LORD as the first part of the lesser duality is absolutely immanent as the lower absolute, the LORD as the second part of the greater duality is absolutely transcendent as the upper absolute, the LORD as the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in himself through partiality, and is therefore partially transcendent towards the angel of the LORD beneath and at the same time partially immanent towards the LORD above.

Just as the first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself and thus causes intrinsic resistance from ist lower end to it’s upper end, so does the Angel of the LORD stand completely by itself through intrinsic resistance.

The second part of the greater duality carries itself through the extrinsic draw of its own infinity, just as the LORD as the second part of the greater duality carries himself through the draw of his own infinity.

The extrinsic draw of the infinity of the second part of the greater duality and the intrinsic resistance of the first part of the lesser duality are both complementarily opposite to one another.

The second part of the lesser duality unites the behavior of both absolutes in itself through partiality, in that on the one hand it causes intrinsic resistance from its lower end to it’s upper end just like the first part of the lesser duality, but at the same time is drawn extrinsically at its upper end through the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality just like the second part of the greater duality.

So does the LORD as the second part of the lesser duality within the hierarchy stand on the Angel of the LORD beneath and is thus partially causing intrinsic resistance, but at the same time is drawn by the LORD as the second part of the greater duality above through partially extrinsic draw.

Just as the second part of the lesser duality is attached to the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, but can also fall from it, so is the LORD attached to the LORD, but can also fall from him.

The LORD is infinite just like the second part of the greater duality as the upper absolute and is thus the greatest of the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality, the Angel of the LORD as the first part of the lesser duality is the smallest of the three, consecutive parts as the lower absolute.

The LORD as the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in himself through partiality, and is thus greater than the Angel of the LORD beneath, but lesser than the LORD above.

The second part of the lesser duality as the middle part of the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality embodies completeness,  the first part of the lesser duality embodies incompleteness, which corresponds to it’s inferior position relative to the second part of the lesser duality, the second part of the greater duality embodies overcompleteness, which corresponds to it’s superior position relative to the second part of the lesser duality.

If the second part of the lesser duality falls into incompleteness against it’s own nature of completeness, it will fall from the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, because it’s suspension is tied to the condition of completeness.

Yeshua as the LORD and the second part of the lesser duality upheld his perfection through his perfect righteousness in the law during his earthly life, and did therefore not fall from the LORD, just like the second part of the lesser duality doesn’t fall from the second part of the greater duality, for as long as it preserves it’s perfection.

The gap between the Angel of the LORD as the first part of the lesser duality and the LORD as the second part of the lesser duality is variable in width, the gap between the LORD as the second part of the lesser duality and the LORD as the second part of the greater duality is fix, in order for him to be able to be suspended by him.

Because the gap between the second part of the lesser duality and the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality is fix, both parts are united, which does also apply to Yeshua, who, as the son and the second part of the lesser duality, is one with the father as the second part of the greater duality within the hierarchy. (John, 10, 30)

Just as the second part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality are one through the fixed gap between them, and thus share one common perspective, so too does the Son and the Father share one common perspective, which is opposing the sole perspective of the Angel of the LORD.

The Angel of the LORD is not an actual third person of the Hierarchy, but rather an alternative appearance of the Father and the Son, in which both share one body together.

While both appear in their actual appearance through two different entities, they appear in their alternative appearance as the Angel of the LORD through a single entity.

In Yeshua's crucifixion the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality are represented, for Yeshua as the King of the Jews on the cross is the second part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the second dimension, the actual, jewish people beneath him, that were present at the crucifixion, is the first part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the first dimension.

The actual Jewish people as the first part of the lesser duality and Yeshua as the King of the Jews and the second part of the lesser duality together form the entire Jewish people and thus the entire lesser duality, which is situated within the first part of the greater duality, and which is viewed through the third dimension.

The Roman Empire is the second part of the greater duality, and is viewed through the fourth dimension, and is viewed together with the entire Jewish people as the first part of the greater duality through the fifth dimension.

Yeshua as the King of the Jews and the second part of the lesser duality was juxtaposed to the actual Jewish people as the first part of the lesser duality, just as the Roman Empire as the second part of the greater duality, which was juxtaposed to the entire Jewish people as the first part of the greater duality.

Just as the king of a people is a part of the entire people, but is to be considered as separate from the actual people, so did Yeshua as the king of the Jews and the second part of the lesser duality form together with the actual people of the Jews as the first part of the lesser duality the entire Jewish people as the lesser duality, but is to be considered as separate from the actual Jewish people, just as both parts of the lesser duality are considered as separate from each other, and are indeed separated from each other by the gap between them, which is variable in width.

Yeshua as the second part of the lesser duality is transcendent to the actual, Jewish people as the first part of the lesser duality, just as the Roman Empire as the second part of the greater duality is transcendent to the entire Jewish people as the first part of the greater duality.

The actual people of the Jews as the first part of the lesser duality is immanent to Yeshua as the King of the Jews and the second part of the lesser duality, just as the entire Jewish people as the first part of the greater duality is immanent to the Roman Empire as the second part of the greater duality.

Thus the actual people of the Jews as the first part of the lesser duality is absolutely immanent as the lower absolute, but the Roman Empire as the second part of the greater duality is absolutely transcendent as the upper absolute, Yeshua as the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in himself through partiality, since on the one hand he is partially transcendent to the actual people of the Jews below him, and at the same time is partially immanent to the Roman Empire above him.

Just as the second part of the lesser duality partially stands on the first part of the lesser duality through its lower end, and at the same time is partially drawn at its upper end by the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, so too was Yeshua's body partially intrinsically resisting through his pierced feet as the lower end of his body, and was partially extrinsically carried through the upper end of his body by his pierced hands.

Just as the second part of the lesser duality can only be supported by the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, so was Yeshua's body supported by the cross, which corresponds to the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

The sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality stands between the second part of the greater duality and the second part of the lesser duality, but belongs only to the second part of the greater duality, not to the second part of the lesser duality, so did the cross not belong to Yeshua as the second part of the lesser duality, but to the Roman Empire as the second part of the greater duality, which had set up the cross for the crucifixion.

Because Yeshua as the King of the Jews and the second part of the lesser duality was elevated above the actual Jewish people as the first part of the lesser duality, he thus contained below him, while at the same time the Jewish people excluded Yeshua as the King of the Jews above him.

Just as the second part of the greater duality transcends the first part of the greater duality and thus includes it under itself, so did the Roman Empire overcome the entire Jewish people and therefore included it under itself, since the Jewish people were under Roman occupation in Yeshua's lifetime, and at the same time the Roman Empire was excluded upwards by the people of the Jews.

Just as the second part of the greater duality transcends the second part of the lesser duality beneath, so too did the Roman Empire, for the Roman Empire was able to overcome Yeshua.

The second part of the lesser duality is exalted over the first part of the lesser duality by the partial suspension on the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, just as Yeshua was exalted by the cross over the actual people of the Jews.

The second part of the lesser duality begins, where the first part of the lesser duality ends, so that the upper end of the first part of the lesser duality adjoins the lower end of the second part of the lesser duality.

The Jews were standing beneath Yeshua, when he was exalted on the cross, and just as the second part of the lesser duality begins, where the first part of the lesser duality ends, so was the vertexes of the Jewish people as the upper end of their bodies right beneath the soles of Yeshua’s  feet as the lower end of his body.

The first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself as the lower absolute of the five-dimensional duality, just as the present Jewish people as the first part of the lesser duality stood on the ground on their own.

The second part of the greater duality carries itself completely by the draw of its own infinity as the upper absolute of the five-dimensional duality, just as the seemingly infinite Roman Empire as the second part of the greater duality was drawn by the pull of it’s own expansionism, in which it ceaselessly strove for the increase of its previous greatness.

Yeshua as the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in himself through partiality, since on the one hand he stood through his pierced feet as the lower end of his body and thus resisted intrinsically like the present, jewish people, and at the same time was carried by his pierced hands as the upper end of his body, just like the Roman Empire was drawn by infinity.

Through the partial suspension of Yeshua’s body by his pierced hands, his body was stretched in length, which corresponds to the second part of the lesser duality, which is partially stretched at its upper end by the draw of the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

Although the second part of the lesser duality is attached to the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, it can also fall from it, so was Yeshua initially suspended by the cross, but was later removed from it again.

The suffocation of the two thieves, who where crucified next to Yeshua, through breaking their legs, indicates the Pneumothorax, which is a condition, under which the lung does detach from the thoracic cavity, and therefore cannot be filled with breath, which leads to the suffocation of the one affected.

The human body is also constructed after the five-dimensional duality, since to torso of the body as the actual body represents the first part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the first dimension, the four extremities extending from it are the second part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the second dimension.

Both parts of the lesser duality together form the entire, lesser duality and thus the entire body as the first part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the third dimension.

The environment beyond the body as the second part of the greater duality is viewed through the fourth dimension, and is viewed together with the entire body through the fifth dimension as the two parts of the greater duality.

The four extremities of the body as the second part of the lesser duality are juxtaposed to the torso as the first part of the lesser duality, just as the environment of the body as the second part of the greater duality is juxtaposed to the whole body as the first part of the greater duality.

The four extremities of the body are transcendent to the torso, just as the environment is transcendent to the whole body, the torso as the actual body is immanent to the four extremities of the body, just as the whole body is immanent to the environment.

The actual body is absolutely immanent as the lower absolute, the environment is absolutely transcendent as the upper absolute, the extremities in between them unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, so that on the one hand they are partially transcendent to the actual body below, but at the same time partially immanent to the environment of the body above.

The actual body as the lower absolute is the smallest in accordance with the first part of the lesser duality in it’s confinement, the surroundings as the upper absolute are the largest in accordance with the infinity of the second part of the greater duality, the blur of the extremities, that is appearing during their movement unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, and are thus larger in their range than the actual body below, but smaller than the surroundings of the body above.

The first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself as the lower absolute of the five-dimensionale duality and resists from its lower end to its upper end, just as the actual body resists from its center outwards as the lower absolute, the second part of the greater duality carries itself completely as the upper absolute, which corresponds to the infinite surroundings of the body.

The second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality and therefore partially resists through its lower end by standing on the inferior, first part of the lesser duality, and at the same time is partially drawn by the firm curvature of the superior, second part of the greater duality, so are the four extremities as the second part of the lesser duality on the one hand also partially resisting from their body joint, and at the same time are also partially drawn by the firm ground of the surroundings, since they stretch out for an interaction with it.

The elongated shape of the four extremities of the body indicates their stretch by the partial pull of the firm curvature of the surroundings, since they stretch out for an interaction with it.

Just as the second part of the lesser duality does not directly interact with the second part of the greater duality, but only indirectly with the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, the do the four extremities of the body not directly interact with the environment of the body as the second part of the greater duality itself, but only indirectly with its solid ground.

The sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality stands between the second part of the greater duality and the second part of the lesser duality as an additional element of the five-dimensional duality, but only belongs to the second part of the greater duality, and not to the second part of the lesser duality, so does the solid ground of the environment not belong to the extremities of the body, but only to the environment itself.

The upper end of the second part of the lesser duality interacts with the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, so do only the ends of the four extremities of the body interact with the solid ground of the environment.

The gap between the second part of the lesser duality and the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality is fix, just as the gap between the four extremities of the body and the solid ground of the environment is fix, since the end of each extremity directly touches the solid ground.

The gap between the first part of the lesser duality and the second part of the lesser duality is variable in width, just as the joint gap between the respective limb and the actual body is variable in width, since both articular surfaces of the joint do not directly touch on each other.

Just as the second part of the lesser duality functions as a bridge and allows an interaction between the first part of the lesser duality beneath and the second part of the greater duality above, so do the extremities of the body function as a bridge, that allows an interaction between the actual body beneath and the environment of the body above.

The blur of the four extremities of the body, that occurs during their volatile motion, are an overlap between the actual body as the lower absolut and the environment of the body as the upper absolut, and do form the partiality out of both absolutes, since the blur is an inconsistency, that is formed out of the consistency of the actual body beneath and the nothingness of the environment of the body above.

Just as the second part of the lesser duality as the middle part of the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality connects both extreme parts with each other, but also separates them from one another, so do the four extremities of the body connect the actual body beneath with the environment of the body above, but also separate them from each other, since they maintain a distance between the two absolute parts.

The conical blur of the four extremities of the body as the second part of the lesser duality encloses the air of the environment within it’s inconsistency, whereby the air of the environment is a subject, because it is immanent in relation to the actual blur of the extremities, but the actual shadow of the extremities is an object because it is transcendent in relation to the air enclosed within it, and is therefore comparable with the lung as the second part of the lesser duality, which encloses the air of the environment within.

The conical shape of the blur of the moving limb is due to the fact, that the speed of movement increases from the body joint as the lower end towards the outer end of the limb as it’s upper end.

The cone shape of the blur of the limb is curved outwardly at its outer end, which corresponds to the outwardly curved curvature of the upper end of the second part of the lesser duality, which can engage in the complementarily inwardly curved curvature of the solid curvature of the second part of the greater duality, which is why the solid ground of the environment of the body has to be curved inwardly.

Because during the very execution of one step the foot as the lower end of the leg does move from the front to the back alongside a curved trajectory.

The anatomy of the hand corresponds to the five-dimensional duality, in that the actual hand is the first part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the first dimension, the fingers are the second part of the lesser duality, which are viewed through the second dimension, both together form the whole hand and the entire lesser duality as the first part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the third dimension.

The environment of the hand as the second part of the greater duality is viewed through the fourth dimension, and is viewed together with the whole hand as the first part of the greater duality through the fifth dimension.

The fingers as the second part of the lesser duality are juxtaposed to the actual hand as the first part of the lesser duality, just as the environment as the second part of the greater duality is juxtaposed to the entire hand as the first part of the greater duality.

The fingers as the second part of the lesser duality are transcendent to the actual hand as the first part of the lesser duality, just as the environment of the hand as the second part of the greater duality is transcendent to the whole hand as the first part of the greater duality.

The actual hand as the first part of the lesser duality is immanent to the fingers as the second part of the lesser duality, so too is the entire hand as the first part of the greater duality immanent to the environment of the hand as the second part of the greater duality.

The actual hand as the first part of the lesser duality is absolutely immanent as the lower absolute, the environment of the hand as the second part of the greater duality is absolutely transcendent as the upper absolute, the fingers as the second part of the lesser duality unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality and thus are on the one hand partially transcendent in relation to the actual hand below and at the same time partially immanent in relation to the environment of the hand above.

Just as the first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself as the lower absolute, so does the actual hand also resists outwardly from its center, and just as the second part of the greater duality supports itself completely by the drawn of it’s own infinity as the upper absolute, so does the environment of the hand also sustain itself by the draw of its own infinity.

The fingers as the second part of the lesser duality unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, because on the one hand the fingers partially resist from their base joint, but at the same time they are partially pulled by the firm curvature of the environment of the hand, because they reach out for interaction with it.

The fingers are reaching out for an interaction with the firm curvature of the environment of the hand, because the fingertips are meant for touching, and interact with the firm ground of the environment, in the very same manner, in which the upper end of the second part of the lesser duality interacts with the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

The elongated shape of the fingers indicates the partial stretch by the draw of the firm curvature of the environment of the hand, in the very same manner, in which the second part of the lesser duality is stretched in it’s longitude by the draw of the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

The second part of the lesser duality does not directly interact with the second part of the greater duality, but only indirectly through the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, so do the fingers not directly interact with the environment of the hand, but only indirectly through it’s firm ground.

The fingertips, that are meant for touching, form an outwardly bend curvature alongside their tips due to their different lengths, which corresponds to the outwardly bent upper end of the second part of the lesser duality, which is why the firm ground of the environment has to be complementarily inwardly bent, in order for both to interact with one another.

Just as the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality stands between the second part of the greater duality and the second part of the lesser duality, but belongs only to the second part of the greater duality, so does the firm ground of the environment of the hand stand between the environment of the hand and the fingers, but belongs only to the environment hand.

The gap between the second part of the lesser duality and the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality is fix, just as the gap between the fingers and the firm ground of the environment of the hand is fix during touching.

The gap between the second part of the lesser duality and the first part of the lesser duality is variable in width, just as the joint gap of the metacarpophalangeal joint between the fingers and the metacarpal bones is variable in width, since the articular surfaces do not necessarily touch one another.

The second part of the lesser duality as the middle part connects the first part of the lesser duality as the lower absolut with the second part of the greater duality as the upper absolute, but also separates them from each other through its partial intrinsic resistance, just as the fingers connect the actual hand below with the environment of the hand above, but at the same time also separate them from each other through their  own partial, intrinsic resistance.

The actual hand in its consistency as the first part of the lesser duality is the lower absolute, the environment of the hand in its nothingness as the second part of the greater duality is the upper absolute, the fingers as the second part of the lesser duality between them form out of both absolutes partiality by enclosing the air of the environment of the hand in their interspaces and thus forming inconsistency.

The air of the environment enclosed between the fingers in their interstices is a subject, because they are immanent to the fingers, the fingers are an object to the air of the environment enclosed between them because they are transcendent to it.

The fingers as the second part of the lesser duality form a bridge between the actual hand as the first part of the lesser duality and the environment of the hand as the second part of the greater duality, because as the middle part in it’s partiality they allow for an interaction between the two absolute parts.

The inconsistency of the fingers is an overlap between the actual hand as the lower absolut and the environment as the upper absolut, since the actual hand as the first part of the lesser duality extents into the surrounding air of the hand as the second part of the greater duality, in the very same manner, in which the surrounding air of the hand extents into the interstices of the fingers.

The anatomy of the foot is constructed according to the five-dimensional duality, since the actual foot is the first part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the first dimension, the toes are the second part of the lesser duality, which are viewed through the second dimension, both together form the whole foot as the lesser duality and thus the first part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the third dimension.

The environment of the foot as the second part of the greater duality is viewed through the fourth dimension, the whole foot as the first part of the greater duality is viewed together with the environment as the second part of the greater duality through the fifth dimension.

The toes as the second part of the lesser duality are juxtaposed to the actual foot as the first part of the lesser duality, just as the environment  of the foot as the second part of the greater duality is juxtaposed to the whole foot as the first part of the greater duality.

The toes as the second part of the lesser duality are transcendent to the actual foot as the first part of the lesser duality, just as the environment  of the foot as the second part of the greater duality is transcendent to the entire foot as the first part of the greater duality.

The actual foot as the first part of the lesser duality is immanent in relation to the toes as the second part of the lesser duality, just as the entire foot as the first part of the greater duality is immanent in relation to the environment of the foot as the second part of the greater duality.

The actual foot as the first part of the lesser duality is absolutely immanent as the lower absolute, the environment of the foot as the second part of the greater duality is absolutely transcendent as the upper absolute, the toes as the second part of the lesser duality unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, and are thus partially transcendent to the actual foot beneath, and at the same time partially immanent to the environment of the foot above.

The tips of the toes intended for touching form an outer curvature due to their different lengths, that interacts with the complementarily oppositely inner curvature of the solid ground of the environment, which corresponds to the outwardly curved, upper end of the second part of the lesser duality, which interacts with the inwardly curved, solid curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

Just as the solid curvature of the second part of the greater duality stands as an additional element within the five-dimensional duality between the second part of the greater duality and the second part of the lesser duality, but belongs only to the second part of the greater duality, so too  does the solid ground of the environment stand between the second part of the greater duality and the second part of the lesser duality.

The toes as the second part of the lesser duality enclose the air of the environment in their interstices and thus form the inconsistency of the partiality of the consistency of the actual foot as the first part of the lesser duality beneath, and the voidness of the air of the environment as the second part of the greater duality above.

The air of the environment enclosed in the interstices is a subject, because it is immanent in relation to the enclosing toes, whereas the toes are an object, because they are transcendent in relation to the air enclosed in the interstices.

The toes as the second part of the lesser duality form a bridge between the actual foot as the first part of the lesser duality and the environment  of the foot as the second part of the greater duality, because as the middle part of the three, consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality they connect both extreme parts with each other.

The inconsistency of the toes is an overlap between the actual foot as the lower absolut and the environment of the foot as the upper absolut part.

Just as the second part of the lesser duality separates the first part of the lesser duality below from the second part of the greater duality above trough partial intrinsic resistance, so do also the toes separate the actual foot below from the environment of the foot above through their partial intrinsic resistance.

Just as the gap between the second part of the lesser duality and the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality is fix, so too is the gap between the tip of the toes, that are meant for touching, and the firm ground of the environment of the foot fixed, and just as the gap between the first part of the lesser duality and the second part of the lesser duality is variable in width, so too is the joint gap of the metacarpophalangeal joint between the hand and the fingers variable in width, since the articular surfaces do not necessarily directly touch one another.

Just as the first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself as the lower absolute, so does also the actual foot resist outwards from its center, and just as the second part of the greater duality supports itself by the draw of its own infinity as the upper absolute, so too does the environment of the foot sustain itself by the draw of its own infinity.

The toes as the second part of the lesser duality unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, because on the one hand they offer partial, intrinsic resistance from the toe base joint, but at the same time they are partially drawn by the firm curvature of the environment of the foot, because the toes reach out for interaction with it.

The elongated shape of the toes indicates the stretch, that the toes are experiencing through the partial draw of the firm ground of the environment, they are reaching out to for an interaction.

A pregnant woman in relation to her unborn child embodies with it the three consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality, for the unborn child of a pregnant woman represents the first part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the first dimension, the umbilical cord together with the placenta is the second part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the second dimension, the unborn child together with the umbilical cord forms the entire, lesser duality and thus the first part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the third dimension.

The pregnant woman is the second part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the fourth dimension, and is viewed together with the first part of the greater duality through the fifth dimension.

The umbilical cord as the second part of the lesser duality is opposed to the unborn as the first part of the lesser duality, just as the pregnant woman as the second part of the greater duality is opposed to the first part of the greater duality.

The umbilical cord together with the placenta as the second part of the lesser duality is transcendent to the unborn as the first part of the lesser duality, just as the pregnant woman as the second part of the greater duality is transcendent to the lesser duality as the first part of the greater duality.

The unborn as the first part of the lesser duality is immanent in relation to the umbilical cord together with the placenta as the second part of the lesser duality, just as the first part of the greater duality is immanent in relation to the pregnant woman as the second part of the greater duality.

The unborn is absolutely immanent as the lower absolute, but the pregnant woman is absolutely transcendent as the upper absolute, but the umbilical cord together with the placenta unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, and is thus on the one hand partially transcendent in relation to the unborn below and at the same time partially immanent in relation to the pregnant woman above.

The unborn as the first part of the lesser duality is absolutely immanent as the lower absolute, the pregnant woman as the second part of the greater duality is absolutely transcendent as the upper absolute, the umbilical cord together with the placenta as the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, and is thus partially transcendent towards the unborn, and at the same time partially immanent towards the pregnant woman.

Just as the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality serves for the partial suspension of the second part of the lesser duality, the uterus of the pregnant woman also serves as a suspension for the placenta together with the umbilical cord as the second part of the lesser duality, whose outwardly curved outer side adheres to the inner curvature of the uterus through adhesion.

Just as the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality stands between the second part of the greater duality and the second part of the lesser duality, but belongs only to the second part of the greater duality, so too does the uterus stand between the pregnant woman as the second part of the greater duality and the placenta as the second part of the lesser duality, but belongs anatomically only to the pregnant woman, not to the placenta.

The second part of the greater duality is located above its firm curvature, so is the pregnant woman as the second part of the greater duality also outside her own uterus.

The gap between the first part of the lesser duality and the second part of the lesser duality is variable in width, so does the umbilical cord separate from the navel of the newborn after birth, but the gap between the second part of the lesser duality and the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality is fixed, just as the gap between the placenta and the uterus is fixed, in order for the adhesion between the can occur.

Just as the second part of the lesser duality can fall away from the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality by breaking the adhesion between them, so does also the placenta falls away from the inside of the womb at birth by breaking the adhesion between them.

Just as the outwardly curved curvature of the upper end of the second part of the lesser duality and the inwardly curved curvature of the second part of the greater duality complement one another, so too does the outwardly curved curvature of the placenta and the inwardly curved curvature of the uterus complement one another.

The second part of the greater duality carries itself completely by the draw of its own infinity, so too does the pregnant woman carry her own weight as the upper absolute, the first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself, so does the unborn child lie within the womb as the lower absolute.

The umbilical cord together with the placenta as the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, and is on the one hand partially drawn through adhesion at its upper end by the uterus as the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, and at the same time the umbilical cord protrudes from the navel of the unborn child through partial, intrinsic resistance.

The second part of the lesser duality unites the consistency of the first part of the lesser duality as the lower absolute with the nothingness of the second part of the greater duality as the upper absolute, through the partiality of inconsistency, just as the umbilical cord unites the absolute of the consistency of the unborn child with the absolut of the surrounding amniotic fluid through the partiality of its inconsistency, for it encloses the surrounding amniotic fluid in the spaces between its convolutions.

The amniotic fluid is a subject, because it is immanent to the convolutions of the umbilical cord, that enclose it, but the umbilical cord is an object, since it is transcendent to the amniotic fluid enclosed between them.

Just as the first part of the lesser duality as the absolute on this side cannot interact directly with the second part of the greater duality as the absolute on the other side, but only through the second part of the lesser duality in its partiality between them as an intermediary, so too does the unborn as the first part of the lesser duality not directly interact with the pregnant women as second part of the greater duality as the upper absolute, but only through the placenta with the umbilical cord as the second part of the lesser duality between them.

Just as the second part of the lesser duality creates a bilaterally oriented bridge between the first part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality, the umbilical cord together with the placenta is also a bilateral bridge between the unborn child as the lower absolute and the pregnant woman as the upper absolute, because on the one hand nutrient-rich and oxygen-rich blood passes from the pregnant woman to the unborn child via the venes, and at the same time nutrient-poor and carbondioxide-rich blood passes from the unborn child back to the pregnant woman via the artery.

The umbilical cord together with the placenta as the middle part of the three, konsekutive parts of the five-dimensional duality, separates the pregnant woman as the upper extreme from the unborn child as the lower extreme from one another, but also connects them at the same time.

The actual sperm represents the first part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the first dimension, the flagellum is the second part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the second dimension, both together form the lesser duality and thus the first part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the third dimension.

The clear of the sperm represents the second part of the greater duality and is viewed through the fourth dimension, and is viewed together with the whole sperm as the first part of the greater duality through the fifth dimension of the five-dimensional duality.

Just as the actual sperm as the first part of the lesser duality is opposed to the flagellum as the second part of the lesser duality, the entire sperm as the first part of the greater duality is opposed to the seminal fluid as the second part of the greater duality.

The flagellum is transcendent to the actual sperm beneath, just as the seminal fluid of the semen is transcendent to the whole sperm beneath, and just as the actual sperm is immanent to the flagellum above, so is the whole sperm immanent to the seminal fluid above.

The actual sperm as the first part of the lesser duality is absolutely immanent as the lower absolute, the seminal fluid as the second part of the greater duality is absolutely transcendent as the upper absolute, the flagellum of the sperm as the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, and is on the one hand partially transcendent to the actual sperm below and at the same time partially immanent to the seminal fluid above.

The first part of the lesser duality is the smallest of the three consecutive parts of the five-dimensional duality due to its limitation as the lower absolute, the second part of the greater duality is the greatest of them as the upper absolute due to its infinity, the second part of the lesser duality between them unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, and is thus greater than the first part of the lesser duality beneath, and lesser than the second part of the greater duality above.

In the same way, the actual sperm as the first part of the lesser duality and the lower absolute is the smallest, the surrounding seminal fluid as the second part of the greater duality is the largest, the flagellum between them unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, and is thus on the one hand greater than the actual sperm beneath, but smaller than the surrounding seminal fluid above.

The lash of the flagellum pushes away the seminal fluid as the surrounding medium, causing it to temporarily harden, and the faster the lash of the flagellum occurs, the stronger the seminal fluid is pushed away, the stronger is its temporary hardening.

The inwardly curved curvature of the pushed away seminal fluid at the outer end of the flagellum corresponds to the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, which is also curved inwardly, the outwardly curved end of the flagellum on the other side corresponds to the outwardly curved, upper end of the second part of the lesser duality.

The outwardly curved, upper end of the second part of the lesser duality and the inwardly curved, firm curvature of the second part of the lesser duality can interact with one another due to their complementarily opposite curvatures, so can also the outwardly curved upper end of the flagellum interact with the inwardly curved seminal fluid.

Just as the fixed curvature of the second part of the greater duality stands as an additional element inbetween the second part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality, but belongs only to the second part of the greater duality, so the pushed away curvature of the seminal fluid, that stands between the seminal fluid itself and the flagellum of the sperm, and yet only belongs to the seminal fluid itself.

The temporary hardening of the seminal fluid at the upper end of the flagellum allows the actual sperm to push itself forward through it’s flagellum.

Because the flagellum of the sperm as the second part of the lesser duality allows an interaction between the actual sperm as the first part of the lesser duality and the seminal fluid as the second part of the greater duality, it acts as a bridge between both.

The inconsistency of the flagellum as the second part of the lesser duality is an overlap between the actual sperm and the surrounding seminal fluid, because in the very same manner, in which the actual sperm extents into the seminal fluid, so does the seminal fluid extent into the interstice of the convolution of the flagellum.

Just as the second part of the lesser duality connects the first part of the lesser duality with the second part of the greater duality on the one hand, but at the same time also separates them from each other, so does the flagellum of the sperm also connects the actual sperm beneath with the seminal fluid above, but also separates them from each other.

The first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself as the lower absolute through the intrinsic resistance, that emanates from its lower end to its upper end, the second part of the greater duality is drawn by the extrinsic draw of its own infinity as the upper absolute, the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality, in that its lower end on the one hand offers partial intrinsic resistance, but its upper end at the same time is partially drawn by the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

The actual sperm as the first part of the lesser duality is intrinsically resisting from its center outwards as the lower absolute, the seminal fluid of the semen as the second part of the greater duality spreads out, which corresponds to the behavior of the second part of the greater duality, which is drawn by it’s own infinity as the upper absolute.

The flagellum of the sperm as the second part of the lesser duality unites both absolutes in itself through partiality due to it’s partial intrinsic resistance starting from it’s lower end, but at the same time it is partially drawn by the firm curvature of the seminal fluid, because it stretches out for an interaction with the seminal fluid.

The flagellum of the sperm encloses the surrounding seminal fluid in the interstices of its convolutions, and forms the partiality of inconsistency from the absoluteness of the consistency of the actual sperm beneath and the absoluteness of the nullity of the surrounding seminal fluid above.

The seminal fluid enclosed in the interstices of the convolutions of the flagellum is a subject, because it is immanent in relation to the convolutions of the flagellum, but the flagellum itself is an object, because it is transcendent in relation to the seminal fluid enclosed in its interstices.

The actual body of the bird is comparable to the first part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the first dimension, the wings are the second part of the lesser duality, which is viewed through the second dimension, both together form the whole bird as the lesser duality and thus the first part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the third dimension.

The air of the environment as the second part of the greater duality is viewed through the fourth dimension, the whole bird as the first part of the greater duality in its relation to the air of the environment are both viewed together through the fifth dimension of the five-dimensional duality.

The actual bird as the first part of the lesser duality and its wings as the second part of the lesser duality are juxtaposed to each other as the two parts of the lesser duality, just as the entire bird as the first part of the greater duality and the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality are juxtaposed to each other as the two parts of the greater duality.

The wings as the second part of the lesser duality are transcendent to the actual bird as the first part of the lesser duality beneath, just as the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality is transcendent to the entire bird as the first part of the greater duality beneath.

The actual bird as the first part of the lesser duality is immanent to the wings as the second part of the lesser duality above, so is also the entire bird as the first part of the greater duality immanent to the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality above.

The actual bird as the first part of the lesser duality is absolutely immanent as the lower absolute, the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality is absolutely transcendent as the upper absolute, the wings as the second part of the lesser duality unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, and are partially transcendent towards the actual bird below, and at the same time partially immanent towards the surrounding air above.

The actual bird as the lower absolute is the smallest according to the first part of the lesser duality in its limitation, the surrounding air is the largest in its seeming infinity according to the infinity of the second part of the greater duality, the spread of the flapping wings between them unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, and is on the one hand greater than the actual bird beneath, but lesser in size than the surrounding air above.

The wings as the second part of the lesser duality form a cone-shaped shadow during their recurring, volatile swing, when flapping, which consists on the one hand of the actual wing itself and at the same time of the surrounding air, and corresponds to the inconsistency of partiality, which is formed from the consistency of the actual bird as the first part of the lesser duality and the lower absolute and the nullity of the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality and the upper absolute.

Through the volatile movement of the wings as the second part of the lesser duality, the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality is enclosed within the boundaries of its conical shadow of the wings, the air being the subject, because it is immanent to the actual wing, whereas the wings are an object, because they are transcendent to the air enclosed within the shadow.

The gap between the second part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality is fixed, just as the shadow of the wing of the bird as the second part of the lesser duality is in direct contact with the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality, the gap between the first part of the lesser duality and the second part of the lesser duality is variable in width, which corresponds to the joint gap, that stands between the wing as the second part of the lesser duality and the actual bird as the first part of the lesser duality.

The conical shape of the shadow is due to the fact, that the flapping speed along the wing increases from its proximal end to its distal end, whereby the flapping speed is slowest at the wing joint and fastest at the tip of the wing.

The temporary hardening of the surrounding air through the flapping of the wings causes a curvature at the end of the wing, which is comparable with the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, and just as the sufficiently firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality stands between it and the second part of the lesser duality, and yet only belongs to the second part of the greater duality, so does the firm curvature of the displaced air stand in-between the wing and the surrounding air, and yet only belongs to the surrounding air.

The denser the air is as the surrounding medium the lower the flapping speed of the wing can be to create the air resistance by it’s hardening, and the less dense it is, the faster it must be.

By hardening the surrounding air the bird can push off from it by flapping its wings and thus move in the opposite direction.

The end of the cone-shaped shadow is curved outwardly and extents into the inwardly curved, shielding curvature of the displaced air, just as the outwardly curved end of the second part of the lesser duality is curved outwardly, so that it can extent into the inner curvature of the solid curvature of the second part of the greater duality.

The actual bird as the first part of the lesser duality cannot directly interact with the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality, but only indirectly through its wings as the second part of the lesser duality between them, which are thus serving as a bridge between them, in the very same manner, in which the second part of the lesser duality serves as a bridge between the first part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality.

The inconsistency of the shadow of the wings is an overlap between the actual bird in it’s consistency and the surrounding air in it’s nullity, because the nullity of the surrounding air extents into the blur of the flapping wings, in the very same manner, in which the flapping wings extent into the surrounding air.

The wings as the middle part of the five-dimensional duality separate the actual bird beneath from the surrounding air above as the two extreme parts, but also connect them at the same time.

The first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself through intrinsic resistance as the lower absolute, just as the actual bird is intrinsically resisting outwardly away from it’s center, and just as the second part of the greater duality supports itself completely by the extrinsic draw of its own infinity as the upper absolute, so is the surrounding air as the second part of the greater duality drawn by its own infinity.

The wings of birds as the second part of the lesser duality unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, in that on the one hand they partially intrinsically resisting starting from the wing joint as their lower end, but at the same time are partially extrinsically drawn by the firm curvature of the surrounding air, since they reach out for interaction with the surrounding air.

The actual body of the fish as the first part of the lesser duality is viewed through the first dimension, the fins as the second part of the lesser duality are viewed through the second dimension, they together form the entire lesser duality, and thus the first part of the greater duality, which is viewed through the third dimension.

The surrounding water as the second part of the greater duality is viewed through the fourth dimension, the whole fish as the first part of the greater duality together with the surrounding water is viewed through the fifth dimension.

Just as the second part of the greater duality is infinite, so is the water as the surrounding medium of the fish seemingly infinite.

The actual fish as the first part of the lesser duality is immanent to its fins as the second part of the lesser duality, just as the entire fish as the first part of the greater duality is immanent to the surrounding water as the second part of the greater duality.

The fins as the second part of the lesser duality are transcendent to the actual fish as the first part of the lesser duality, just as the surrounding water as the second part of the greater duality is transcendent to the entire fish as the first part of the greater duality.

The actual fish as the first part of the lesser duality is absolutely immanent as the lower absolute, the surrounding water as the second part of the greater duality is absolutely transcendent as the upper absolute, the fins as the second part of the lesser duality between them unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, and are thus on the one hand partially transcendent to the actual fish below, and at the same time partially immanent to the surrounding water above.

Every sea creature forms a cone-shaped shadow through the volatile swing of their fins, which corresponds to the partiality of the inconsistency of the second part of the lesser duality, which is formed from the consistency of the actual creature as the first part of the lesser duality and the nullity of the surrounding water as the second part of the greater duality.

The conical shadow of the fins includes the surrounding water as the second part of the lesser duality within the limits of its conical form, whereby the surrounding water is a subject, since it is immanent to the fins, but the fins are an object, because they are transcendent to the water within.

The cone shape of the shadow comes from the fact, that the end of the fins moves the fastest in its volatile movement, but its beginning moves the slowest, with the speed of movement along the fin is increasing from it’s beginning to its end, and thus being the slowest in its beginning, but the fastest in its end.

The actual fish as the first part of the lesser duality cannot directly interact with the surrounding water as the second part of the greater duality, but only through its fins as the second part of the lesser duality between them, which are thus acting as a bridge between them.

The fins as the middle part of the five-dimensional duality connect the actual fish as the lower extreme part and the surrounding water as the upper extreme part from each other, but also connect them at the same time.

The inconsistency of the shadow of the fins is an overlap between the actual fish and the surrounding water, the two boundary parts, since in the very same manner, in which the fin extents into the surrounding water, so does the surrounding water extent into the shadow of the fin.

Because of the flapping of the fin, the displaced, surrounding water hardens temporarily, so that a firm curvature of displaced water is formed at the end of the fin, which corresponds to the firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality, which is situated in between the second part of the lesser duality and the second part of the greater duality.

The firm curvature of the second part of the greater duality only belongs to the second part of the greater duality, not to the second part of the lesser duality, just as the firm curvature of the displaced water only belongs to the water itself as the second part of the greater duality, but not to the fish as the first part of the greater duality.

Through the hardening of the displaced water the fish can push itself away from the firm curvature of the displaced water and thus move in the opposite direction.

Just as the first part of the lesser duality stands completely by itself, and thus causes intrinsic resistance from its lower end as the lower absolute, so does the actual fish cause resistance from its center, but the second part of the greater duality is extrinsically drawn by its own infinity as the upper absolute, which corresponds to the surrounding water in its seeming infinity.

The fins of the fish as the second part of the lesser duality unite both absolutes in themselves through partiality, in that on the one hand they partially resisting intrinsically through their lower end by protruding from the body of the fish, but at the same time are extrinsically drawn by the surrounding water at their upper end, since they reach out to interaction with it.